Why is everyone so concerned with making or altering or constructing reality? It’s funny how, while I find them interesting, they have almost nothing to do with my life, except that they are entertaining. But I think the more pertinent and applicable question is why do they continue to talk as if they are talking about some whole world, in a complete denial that they are caught in mere fantasy?
Because it is not that I a somehow ‘missing’ something; it is more that they only address that which confirms their fantasy. UtterMarxism.
What is significant is that they don’t admit it. If they would admit it we might get somewhere. Land: he only addresses the ‘never’, and then continues in it. What about its counterpart: the always ?
synthetic zerØ 
Why is everyone so concerned with making or altering or constructing reality? It’s funny how, while I find them interesting, they have almost nothing to do with my life, except that they are entertaining. But I think the more pertinent and applicable question is why do they continue to talk as if they are talking about some whole world, in a complete denial that they are caught in mere fantasy?
Because it is not that I a somehow ‘missing’ something; it is more that they only address that which confirms their fantasy. UtterMarxism.
What is significant is that they don’t admit it. If they would admit it we might get somewhere. Land: he only addresses the ‘never’, and then continues in it. What about its counterpart: the always ?