2 responses to “Graham Harman’s Anthropocene Ontology”
Yikes.
anything in particular?
I’m not sure why anyone needs meta-physics when we have physics and I think he’s wrong to assert that there are objects like cities or states (which to my mind are rather figures of speech) and more importantly I think he Romanticizes the limits of our grasp with the scifi nonsense about Withdrawal but I appreciate his willingness to acknowledge of how alien/unmasterable existence is to us (and always will be).
synthetic zerØ 
Yikes.
anything in particular?
I’m not sure why anyone needs meta-physics when we have physics and I think he’s wrong to assert that there are objects like cities or states (which to my mind are rather figures of speech) and more importantly I think he Romanticizes the limits of our grasp with the scifi nonsense about Withdrawal but I appreciate his willingness to acknowledge of how alien/unmasterable existence is to us (and always will be).