I can’t manage to make thinkable the vastness of the cosmos (hell I can’t even grasp a “dimensional enfolding of spacetime”, higher or lower) anyone one else care to give it a try? for me Foucault is about the limits of our grasps, the author of what John Caputo came to call a hermeneutics of not-knowing who/what we are.
- Comment
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
synthetic zerØ 
January 13, 2015 at 12:51 pm @Kno-Eco
it’s interesting the question of Deleuze, I don’t doubt that folks like Mader are correct that he was working against the kinds of reductions to actual sciences performed with/on his on work by folks like DeLanda and Protevi but than I am with Malabou that this than puts his contributions into the spirit-ual realm of speculation, so for me we cannot be limited by authorial intentions if we are to make use of his works and not just leave them behind.
If you believe the work of Rabinow and Dreyfus on Foucault than he too was making such a shift to something more akin to an anthropology of the contemporary.
http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2014/10/mary-beth-mader-whence-intensity-deleuze-and-the-revival-of-a-concept/