Latour’s inconsistencies unveiled

much like with Heidegger Latour drifted from useful anthropology to waxing meta-physical and if he doesn’t come back to the rough ground of lived-life I for one can only say adieu.
https://archive.org/details/EntangledAnArchaeologyOfTheRelationshipsBetweenHumansAndThing

Installing (Social) Order

IMG_1322

In this terrific article in New Literary History, Graham Harman draws-out some of Latour’s inconsistencies in his shift from old ANT days (i.e., the early Latour) to the more recent emphasis on “modes” (i.e., the late Latour) related to his culture-nature rejection-reficiation (played with a few of these idea a decade ago reviewing his book PoN).

View original post

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s