Phrenomenology: Zahavi, Dennett and the End of Being

rsbakker's avatarThree Pound Brain

We are led back to these perceptions in all questions regarding origins, but they themselves exclude any further question as to origin. It is clear that the much-talked-of certainty of internal perception, the evidence of the cogito, would lose all meaning and significance if we excluded temporal extension from the sphere of self-evidence and true givenness.

–Husserl, The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness

So recall this list, marvel how it continues to grow, and remember, the catalogue is just getting started. The real tsunami of information is rumbling off in the near horizon. And lest you think your training or education render you exempt, pause and consider the latest in Eric Schwitzgebel’s empirical investigations of how susceptible professional philosophers are to various biases and effects on that list. I ask you to consider what we know regarding human cognitive shortcomings to put you in a skeptical frame of mind. I want…

View original post 5,920 more words

One response to “Phrenomenology: Zahavi, Dennett and the End of Being

  1. this comment does not relate to this post as i haven’t read this post. this comment relates to Laruelle — a head’s up with apologies for not threading this reply to the proper post of a week or so ago.

    i found this book by Anthony R. Galloway on Laruelle, and I’m really deep into it. the book doesn’t appear on any recommendations by Amazon, so it was sure luck i stumbled upon it. it’s so good and readable that i’m going to return 4 or 5 other books on Laruelle to Amazon. maybe it’s personal taste in writing, but i locked in right away to Galloway — and the ride keeps getting better and better.

Leave a reply to hartrichards Cancel reply