Decisionality of any kind (regardless of genre) is figured in relation to the ground [zero] of a self-articulating Earth – the sheer facticity of being as doing. Every offered abstraction partakes in the schematization [+2] of radical immanence  in all its modes. Thus we, the decisionally dependent, are all realists to whatever functional extent or we are delusional.
Philosophers are no better than creationists. Philosophers may hate irrationalist leaps of faith, but French theorist François Laruelle locates their own narcissistic origin story. For him, all philosophy begins with the world as ‘fact.’ The atomists begin with the rain of the void, Kant posits the noumenal thing-in-itself, and the New Materialists start from matter. These facts do not speak for themselves but are mere setup, as once philosophy establishes what ‘is,’ then it narcissistically suggests the world exists for the purpose of proper philosophical reflection. Gottfried Leibniz presents the principle of sufficient reason, “everything in the world happens for a specific reason” (and it is the job of philosophers to identify it), and Alfred North Whitehead alternatively says, “no actual entity, then no reason” (so it is up to philosophers to find one).
View original post 107 more words