much like with Heidegger Latour drifted from useful anthropology to waxing meta-physical and if he doesn’t come back to the rough ground of lived-life I for one can only say adieu.
https://archive.org/details/EntangledAnArchaeologyOfTheRelationshipsBetweenHumansAndThing
In this terrific article in New Literary History, Graham Harman draws-out some of Latour’s inconsistencies in his shift from old ANT days (i.e., the early Latour) to the more recent emphasis on “modes” (i.e., the late Latour) related to his culture-nature rejection-reficiation (played with a few of these idea a decade ago reviewing his book PoN).
synthetic zerØ 