4 responses to “Michel Foucault Beyond Good and Evil”

1. Thanks, it was interesting to watch. Not sure whether it made me think better or worse of Foucault though. Hopefully at least it helped to get to know him a bit better.

   • my pleasure, more of an introduction than a final word on the subject I would hope, the questions raised by the relationships/tensions between biography and philosophy is an intriguing one and for those of of us more focused on the “applied” end there is certainly a drive to test (as Avital Ronell might say) hypotheses with/in our own daily lives:
     [audio src="http://media.rawvoice.com/lse_publiclecturesandevents/richmedia.lse.ac.uk/publiclecturesandevents/20130702_1830_philosophicalBiography.mp3" /]

     • see also: http://www.academia.edu/1924667/Why_is_Speaking_the_Truth_Fearless_Truth_and_Danger_in_Foucaults_Analysis_of_Parrhesia

2. Thanks for the links. I just had a listen to the biography discussion. It was quite nice. Ray Monk I do both like and a bit skeptic about… I remember I got a bit disappointed when I first noticed how thick (many pages) his Wittgenstein biography was.