http://pages.uoregon.edu/toadvine/

Toadvine fleshes out the quasi-theological aspects of (faith in) intuitions, via Merleau-Ponty, that likely bring resonant joy to folks that feel at home in Whitehead’s (and Peirce’s) work                      (and even the orthodox & conservation-minded Heideggerians), but also reaffirm my own contrary ne(ur)o-pragmatist commitments to psychology/anthropology and the growing body of work on cognitive-biases and all. Like with habits, metaphors, figures-of-speech, and reductions/models we cannot do without intuitions (would be crippled without them) but we should not put our faith in them but rather test  them as needed. What if we attended to the differences/particularities (and the related processes/assemblages) at hand without asserting some speculative Whole/Holism?