for reasons along the lines of the earlier Andy Pickering post/video (see below) I’m doubtful of grand syntheses, epochs, meta-physics,consciousness-raising, ideologies, post-humanities (other than the death of the species), and all, too many variables/variations at play, too many buzzing blooming confusions and cognitive-biases in the works…
Guattari’s move from “schizoanalysis” to the “ecosophy” of his later years does not constitute a change in paradigm or the proposition of a new theoretical model. In both cases his concern is not with the elaboration of any particular theory or model, but with facilitating a process of “meta-modelization”. Far from propounding a system, his works are interventions, containing a series of reflections, lines of reference, and reminders on the multiple aspects that any particular model will have to take into account.
A fundamental consideration is the need to think outside the isolated subject confronting an external object, and the need to take into account our directly collective subjectivity and our constitutive supplementation by technical or “machinic” inscription, interface and embedding. We are ecological subjectivities embedded in multiple networks, and not cut-off Cartesian subjects.
Seen from this ecosophical perspective, however interesting an eliminative materialism such as R.Scott Bakker’s BBT model…
View original post 348 more words